Prudence Pimpley's Ordeal

Related Essays

Ordeal By Hunger
Ordeal by Hunger In Ordeal by Hunger, there are many heroes in the disastrous Donner Party story, but one of the most colorful and heroic
Prudence Macintosh
unless you want to be totally worn out. (Prudence Mackintosh pg.73) [ Just As We Were] When Prudence Mackintosh wrote about the Junior League, it showed the
Ordeal By Cheque: The Life Of Jr
John McElyea August 24, 2003 TLC Checkbook Final Draft Ordeal by Cheque: The life of Jr Tony turned the corner at a dangerous speed, trying to go even faster
The Marriage Ordeal: Rights And Ramifications
Jimenez Professor Byron Political Science 102 21 February 2005 The Marriage Ordeal: Rights and Ramifications In a country with it's fundamentals based on

Submitted by to the category Business and Industry on 06/27/2012 08:49 AM

At Gigantic State University hereafter (GSU) the Students for Fair Tuition (hereafter SFT), staged a protest against rising tuition costs by attempting to take over president Dalton Chandler’s office. When his secretary, Prudence Pimply attempted to call the campus police, an altercation occurred between her and the head of the STF, Steve Steel. Prudence was so upset by the incident that she required a doctor’s care and missed several days of work. In this instance, civil suits could be brought, including assault, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligence. A criminal charge of assault could also be brought.

ASSAULT

When Steve Steel slapped the phone from Prudence’s hand and threatened her with a realistic water pistol, he committed the intentional tort of assault. Henry Cheeseman (2010) defines assault as “(1) the threat of immediate harm or offensive contact or (2) any action that arouses reasonable apprehension of imminent harm” (p. 75). Steve slaps the telephone out of Prudence’s hand, and he threatens her with a real looking water pistol. Both of these acts could reasonably cause apprehension of harm. Although Steve could attempt a defense claiming the harm was not intentional, he could have reasonable expected and foreseen the harm. Due to these facts, his actions meet the definition of assault, but since no contact occurred, it could not be considered battery (Cheeseman, 2010).

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

When Steve threatened to shoot Prudence if she moved toward the phone or the door, he committed the tort of false imprisonment. Prudence’s freedom of movement was restrained by the threat of imminent harm. Although the pistol was not a real one, it was realistic looking, and Prudence assumed that it was in fact real. In this instance, Steve has no defense of lack of intent. He did in fact intend to restrain her movements.

INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS

The sum of Steve’s behavior falls under...

View Full Essay
Full Essay Stats...
  • Words: 686
  • Pages: 3
  • Views: 113

Join now to view this essay and thousands of others on PaperCamp.com. It's free Join Now!