Women

Western feminism underestimates and undermines global women and their abilities to develop in western society. It begins so by constructing the idea that women involved in feminism must be wealthy, college educated and white. To be dismissed by one or all the criteria a woman may be seen as a voiceless woman. Mohanty explains ”assumptions of privilege and ethnocentric universality on the one hand, and inadequate self-consciousness about the effect of Western scholarship on the “third world” in the context of a world system dominated by the West on the other, characterize a sizable extent of Western feminist work on women in the third world” (335). She emphasizes that many collegiate works are hence very biased and do not view global woman correctly giving the power of western feminist to define these women. This power struggle contextualizes and places a struggle within feminism that causes oppression to women of color, immigrants and global woman.

Western society then does not value these women and so forth stigmatizes them as struggling victims with a poor value system and no sense or direction for a future. I argue that third world women have more gratitude than their western counterparts. The third world woman prides herself on her household and family in a way many ways western woman do not. Third world women takes job opportunities given to them and do not see service jobs as degrading but essential. Lastly western feminist believe that third worlds woman priority is to find and care for a husband, I argue that is also is not always the case.

Before I explain further I must note that though many of the readings use the term third world woman I feel it is condescending and counterproductive of my argument. For this reason I will revert to the term global woman. As I feel it better assimilates with the notion that these women are globally aware of the world and multiple cultures. The term will refer to immigrant women, and women from other countries...