Submitted by: Submitted by luimanlong
Views: 165
Words: 8780
Pages: 36
Category: Business and Industry
Date Submitted: 12/11/2013 01:16 AM
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck Good Luck
2011 December
Fundamentals of Business Law AAT Public Exam
PLEASE UNDER THE CASE NAME WHEN ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS
Section A Multiple Choice Questions 20Q @20%
Section B Compulsory Questions 2Q @30%
B1 Contract Law
B2 Law of Tort
Section C Optional Questions 2Q out of 3Q @50%
C1 Hong Kong Legal System + Bill of Exchange
C2 Contract Law + Sale of Goods Ordinance (SOGO)
C3 Company Law
Law of Tort
Negligent Misstatements
Question 4
In relation to the tort of negligence, explain the duty of care for negligent misstatements.
Answer
Liability for negligent misstatements commonly arises in cases of professional advice. To succeed in such an action, the plaintiff must also establish a duty of care, breach of duty and resulting damage. A claim for negligent misstatement would invariably involve a claim for pure economic loss and the law of negligence previously recognised a duty of care only for loss which flows from physical damage to a person or his property. However, in the landmark case of Hedley Byrne v Heller (1964) the House of Lords allowed a claim for pure economic loss caused by a negligent statement without any need for...