Submitted by: Submitted by seeyaround
Views: 10
Words: 544
Pages: 3
Category: Business and Industry
Date Submitted: 01/11/2016 04:52 AM
General term used for goods & services
provided by government
Government provides pure public, impure
public & private goods
1
13/11/2015
Pure public goods are:
◦ Non-rival in consumption:
MC of an additional consumer is 0.
If public good is excludable, there may be underconsumption.
Ex. Toll bridge
◦ Non-excludable:
Not being able to charge for the good may result in
undersupply.
Free-rider problem: no incentive to reveal true
preferences since the public good will be provided no
matter what.
Pure private goods are:
◦ Easily excludable (e.g. low transactions cost)
◦ MC of an additional consumer is high;
Impure public goods:
◦ Non-rival & excludable: MC=0 (e.g. cable TV)
◦ Rival: has high MC because of easy access, e.g.
easily congested roads.
The MC is not only the depreciation of the road but
also the time lost to traffic.
Excluding via toll booths is costly and may also cause
congestion .
2
13/11/2015
Impure public goods:
◦ Exclusion or Rationing: The issue is the cost of
rationing and not feasibility of producing the good
Cable TV is excluded with costly scramblers.
The congested highway is excluded by tolls wherein
collecting tolls is the cost of exclusion while the
benefit is less congestion.
Cost of exclusion is called transactions cost. These are
relatively larger for public goods than private goods.
I
Rival
Excludable
(toothbrush)
II
Rival
Non-excludable
(congested highway)
III
Non-rival
Excludable
(cable TV)
IV
Non-rival
Non-excludable
(national defense)
3
13/11/2015
Publicly provided private goods (PPG):
publicly provided goods with a large MC
associated with supplying additional
individuals.
Rationales:
◦
◦
◦
High costs of running the market (i.e. water &
electricity);
Distributive concerns (i.e. school):
opportunities of the young should not depend
on wealth of the parents;
Analysis of welfare...