Submitted by: Submitted by asswipe33
Views: 177
Words: 3938
Pages: 16
Category: Music and Cinema
Date Submitted: 02/13/2013 09:40 AM
¢
•
'
t,
INSURANCE
MATHEMATICS ECONOMICS &
ELSEVIER Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 22 (1998) 243-249
Pricing insurance contracts - an e c o n o m i c v i e w p o i n t
D o r o n K l i g e r a,h, B e n n y L e v i k s o n h,,
a Tel Aviv University and the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania b Faculty of Social Sciences The University ofHaifa, Haifa 31905, Israel
Abstract
This paper presents a new approach for pricing insurance contracts, based both on economic and probabilistic arguments. The novel property of this approach is that it uses the demand for insurance to find the optimal premium an insurer should charge. Our approach stands in contrast to the standard loading factor methods used in actuarial science, where the number of insureds is constant regardless of the charged premium. The insurer maximizes its expected profit, defined as the difference between the expected net revenue from selling insurance contracts and the expected loss due to insolvency. We show how to find the expected-profit maximizing premium, Jr*, and its corresponding optimal number of insureds, n*. The first proposition presented in our paper identifies the premium (and number of insureds that minimize the expected loss due to insolvency). The second proposition gives, for a broad class of demand curves, sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of an internal optimal solution. The third proposition asserts that, due to the suggested expected loss function, the insurer's objective function demonstrates economies to scale. Lastly, we provide a numerical solution for the case of a linear demand curve, giving the optimal premium and number of insureds. © 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
1. Introduction
In this paper we present a new approach for pricing insurance contracts. Our approach is based on probabilistic as well as on economic arguments. The novel property of this paper is that the pricing argument is based on two factors...