Competing Theories of Corrections

Competing Theories of Corrections

Eric Mack

American Intercontinental University

Abstract

This paper will discuss the competing theories of corrections that are prevalent in today’s justice system. A series of suggestions on ways to implement some of the nontraditional theories of corrections will be reviewed. In recent years, parole and probation have been criticized for increasing the risk of community victimization by known offenders. A review of how the goals of punishment and rehabilitative strategies are different. It will show whether there is specific data to support one particular approach over another. Two nontraditional correctional approaches will be discussed and the goals of each will be addressed. My personal opinion will be given on whether I feel the approach is effective. I will also give my opinion on whether these approaches are more cost effective than conventional incarceration, and why I believe so. My opinion will be supported with data on recidivism, completion of academic and vocational programs within the prison system.

Competing Theories of Corrections

Over the past decades new sentencing options have become available, which are considered as transitional measures. These measures are intended to give prosecutors, judges, and corrections officials alternate sentencing options. Such options allow officials to employ suitable punishments to convicted offenders while not being compelled by traditional choice between prison and probation. In the past sentencing options were limited to incarceration and probation but now there is a broad range of choices that exists in many courtrooms (Schmalleger, Ph.D., F. 2012, Chapter 10). The implementation of split sentencing sanctions has widened the use of sentencing alternatives. These sanctions have played a role in the development of numerous alternative sentencing programs. Evidence shows that there are various successful programs that reduce future criminal...