Recommendations for No Child Left Behind Reauthorization

Related Essays

Why Congress Should Not Reauthorize The No Child Left Behind Act
are few arguments that oppose my thesis that Congress should not reauthorize the No Child Left Behind Act. Some people believe that since test scores are rising, the
No Child Left Behind
Running head: THE No Child Left Behind Act The No Child Left Behind Act: Friend or Foe: Acknowledgements First and foremost I would like to thank God for the
No Child Left Behind
2004 No Child Left Behind Updated Sept. 19, 2011 The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, signed into law by President Bush on Jan. 8, 2002, was a reauthorization of
No Child Left Behind
Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) is a United States Act of Congress that came ... with little bipartisan support. NCLB is a reauthorization of the Elementary and

Submitted by to the category Societal Issues on 10/13/2012 07:13 PM

Memorandum

To: U.S Secretary of Education

From: Nana Duncan

Date: December 1, 2011

Re: Recommendations for No Child Left Behind Reauthorization

INTRODUCTION

In 2001, the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act was passed with bipartisan support by the Bush Administration, setting the ambitious goal for proficiency in reading and math for all students in primary and secondary education by 2014. The Act was a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965, and aimed at restoring quality of education for all children, mainly through: increased accountability for schools, provision of more choices for parents and students (particularly those in low performing schools), stronger emphasis on reading, and greater flexibility for states, school districts, and schools. The Act changed the discourse and landscape for education with its ambitious goals and demanding requirements, and has sparked vigorous debate. In the following, I offer recommendations for the pending reauthorization, with careful consideration and analyses of what has and has not worked with the 2001 Act.

EVALUATING NCLB GOALS

Accountability and Assessment The Act required states to implement accountability systems covering all public schools and students, based on challenging state standards in mathematics and reading. Annual testing and statewide Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) objectives for grades 3-8 aimed at ensuring all students reach proficiency by 2014. Supporters of the Act believe that this fosters educational growth and achievement, and sets standards for teacher qualifications. They also believe that it helps close the achievement gap between white and minority students, by measuring educational status and growth by ethnicity. Detractors would say that this goal of accountability and assessments has simply put a band-aid on symptoms of poor education outcomes, rather than dealing with root causes. In some cases, NCLB has become a burden on state and local...

View Full Essay
Full Essay Stats...
  • Words: 2209
  • Pages: 9
  • Views: 123