Lafarge Comparision

Submitted by: Submitted by

Views: 154

Words: 3095

Pages: 13

Category: Business and Industry

Date Submitted: 03/07/2013 04:06 AM

Report This Essay

Comparison of Annual Reports

Lafarge Vs Holcim FY 2011

1/27/2013

Team Assignment

Members

* T. Kumaravel

* Vivek Srivastava

* Amit Vaish

* Su La Han

OFFICIAL ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET |

Student Name: | T. Kumaravel, Su La Han, Amit Vaish, Vivek Srivastava | Student Number: | kt10741, sh9068, av10479, vs10722 | |

Assignment Number: | one | Title: | Analysis of Annual reports | |

Professor’s Name: | Dr. Chinmoy Sahu | |

Due Date: | 27/01/2013 | Subject Code and Name: | MBA611 - Financial Reporting | |

DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY OF WORK:I affirm that the attached work is entirely my own except where the words or ideas of other writers are specifically acknowledged through the use of inverted commas and in-text references. This assignment has not been submitted for any other subject at U21Global or any other institution. I have revised, edited, and proofread this paper. |

| (To input your electronic signature, double-click on this box and select ‘checked’) | Word count: | 3000 | |

|

Assessment Criteria | Grade S/U* | Comments |

1 | Critical thinking - analysed, critically, the issues using appropriate concepts and methods. | | |

2 | Relevance – ideas and arguments were highly relevant to the problem | | |

3 | Originality – novel ideas were introduced and explained with substantial depth and detail | | |

4 | Justification – arguments were convincingly supported with relevant readings and data | | |

5 | Presentation and articulation – ideas were expressed in a clear and concise manner | | |

* S = satisfactory; U = unsatisfactory. To achieve a passing grade, criterion number 1 must be assessed as satisfactory. | Percentage: |

Name of examiner: | | Date: | | |

Note to students: Please ensure that your filenames do not contain Reserved characters such as /?:@=& ; or unsafe characters like “<...