Submitted by: Submitted by samkelo
Views: 10
Words: 6716
Pages: 27
Category: Literature
Date Submitted: 08/07/2016 12:14 PM
CHAPTER 5
HOW LEGISLATION IS INTERPRETED
5.1 Introduction
* The theoretical background of statutory interpretation
cannot simply be ignored or wished away. A basic
understanding of theory is essential for a perspective on and
understanding of legal interpretation.
* One of the reasons for the dismal state of statutory
interpretation in SA is the lack of a sound theoretical basis for
the discipline.
* The aim of this chapter is to provide a brief survey of the
theoretical basis of statutory interpretation in SA.
5.2 Theories of interpretation
* Only two main approaches will be discussed: the literal
(text based) approach and the purposive (text-in-context)
approach, followed by an inclusive methodology based on the
five techniques of interpretation suggested by Du Plessis and
Corder.
* The difference between the two main approaches to
statutory interpretation in SA can largely be reduced to the
respective views on the relationship between the text and
the context of legislation.
2
5.2.1
THE ORTHODOX TEXT-BASED (LITERAL)
APPROACH
* According to this approach the interpreter should
concentrate primarily on the literal meaning of the provision
to be interpreted.
* The interpretation process should proceed along the
following lines:
Primary rule of interpretation: if the m e a n i n g of
the word is clear, it should be put into effect; it must be
equated with the legislator’s intention.
If the ‘plain meaning’ of the word
- is ambiguous, vague or misleading or
- if a strict literal interpretation would result in absurd
results
- then the court may deviate from the literal meaning to
avoid such an absurdity.
- This is also known as the ‘golden rule’ of interpretation.
Then the court will turn to secondary aids of interpretation
to find the intention of the legislature eg
- the long title of the statute;
- headings to chapters and sections;
- the text in the other official language;
- etc.
Should these ‘secondary aids’ to interpretation prove
insufficient to...