Ethical Concepts and Dilemmas

Ethical Concepts and Dilemmas

There are many different ways to process moral dilemmas and numerous theories try to define these different approaches. Jones (2001) puts forth that the moral intensity of a specific issue greatly impacts how an individual might process different moral dilemmas. In the case of Wisson, Valerie believes that Waters has materially hurt the company by negatively impacting the quality of the product with poor management of his team and preferential treatment of the vendors giving him monetary kickbacks. She also knows that society views bribes in the workplace as unethical and a legal argument against such behavior could be made. This argument is strengthened since these specific activities are forbidden by company policy.Valerie works on a small team and is close to many of the employees that are affected by the behavior of Waters. She is also aware of a much larger network, including the Wisson company, fragrance vendors, and individual perfumers, that are being affected by Waters' actions. These factors, defined by Jones (2001) as magnitude, social consensus, proximity, and concentration give higher moral intensity to the issue and raise Valerie's awareness and need to respond in some way (Jones, 2001).

Three frameworks will likely shape Valerie's response: Self-serving principles, balancing interests principles, and concern for others principles (Hellriegel & Slocum, 2009). Within these three frameworks are principles that Valerie seems to be considering more heavily.Organizational principles, considered self-serving, are being employed when Valerie factors in the harm done to Wisson. The company is potentially producing a lower quality product because of Waters' unethical behavior (Hellriegel & Slocum, 2009). Utilitarian and professional standards principles try to evaluate impact on multiple people or groups and balance their interests (Hellriegel & Slocum, 2009). It is utilitarian for Valerie to remain silent on the...