Submitted by: Submitted by vikram4b2
Views: 10
Words: 7360
Pages: 30
Category: Literature
Date Submitted: 11/30/2015 10:12 PM
Change the Way You Persuade
by Gary A. Williams and Robert B. Miller
Reprint r0205d
May 2002
HBR Case Study
A Pain in the (Supply) Chain
r0205a
John Butman
HBR at Large
How Resilience Works
r0205b
Diane L. Coutu
Different Voice
Turning an Industry Inside Out:
A Conversation with Robert Redford
Change the Way You Persuade
r0205c
r0205d
Gary A. Williams and Robert B. Miller
HBR Spotlight: Practical Strategy
Divestiture: Strategy’s Missing Link
r0205e
Lee Dranikoff, Tim Koller, and Antoon Schneider
Why Business Models Matter
r0205f
Joan Magretta
Disruptive Change: When Trying Harder
Is Part of the Problem
r0205g
Clark Gilbert and Joseph L. Bower
Tool Kit
Read a Plant – Fast
r0205h
R. Eugene Goodson
The Entrepreneur
A Test for the Fainthearted
Walter Kuemmerle
r0205j
Managers typically use a one-size-fits-all approach when trying to influence
their bosses and colleagues. New research shows that’s a mistake. Persuasion
works best when it’s tailored to five distinct decision-making styles.
CHANGE THE WAY YOU
PERSUADE
by Gary A. Williams and Robert B. Miller
I
t’s happened to you before. You call a meeting to
try to convince your boss and peers that your company
needs to make an important move – for instance, funding a risky but promising venture. Your argument is impassioned, your logic unassailable, your data bulletproof.
Two weeks later, though, you learn that your brilliant proposal has been tabled. What went wrong?
All too often, people make the mistake of focusing too
much on the content of their argument and not enough
on how they deliver that message. Indeed, far too many
decisions go the wrong way because information is presented ineffectively. In our experience, people can vastly
improve their chances of having their proposals succeed
by determining who the chief decision maker is among
the executives they are trying to persuade and then tailoring...